Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Unraveling Protein S Deficiency: Insights from a Population-Based Multiomic Study
Protein S deficiency challenges venous thromboembolism (VTE) management. Guidelines discourage routine protein S testing in patients requiring lifelong anticoagulation or with unprovoked/recurrent VTE. Questions persist about the role of genetics in these patients. This large-scale (>600,000 individuals), population-based multiomic study from U.K and U.S. datasets clarifies the prevalence of PROS1 variants and their relationship to circulating protein S levels and thrombosis risk. The researchers used the functional impact score (FIS; range 0–1), which categorizes gene variants based on their evolutionary conservation; higher scores predict more-severe disruption of the protein's function.
The results were as follows:
- High-risk PROS1 variants (FIS=1, frameshift and splice site mutations) are rare (0.01% prevalence), associated with severe protein S deficiency (~50% of normal levels), and confer a 14-fold increased risk for VTE.
- Moderate-risk PROS1 variants (FIS >0.7, missense mutations) are more common (~0.2, have variable penetrance and impact on protein S levels, and confer lower risk of VTE (~2-fold).
- PROS1 variants are not associated with increased risk for myocardial infarction, peripheral arterial disease, or ischemic stroke.
- Protein S deficiency in individuals with wild-type PROS1 (no variants) is associated with a 2.5-fold risk for VTE and peripheral artery disease.
Comment
As protein S levels alone are insufficient to predict VTE risk, these results suggest that an integrated genomic-proteomic approach can improve risk stratification. While the rarity of high-risk PROS1 variants does not justify routine genetic testing at a population level, these insights provide clinicians with powerful new tools to individualize thrombosis risk and optimize the duration of anticoagulation therapy for high-risk individuals.
Citation(s)
Author:
Chaudhry SA et al.
Title:
Population-scale studies of protein S abnormalities and thrombosis.
Source:
JAMA
2025
Mar
3; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Anjali A. Sharathkumar, MBBS, MD, MS