Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
The American College of Physicians Weighs In on Colorectal Cancer Screening
Sponsoring Organization: American College of Physicians (ACP)
Background
The most influential U.S. guidelines on colorectal cancer screening probably are those of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and the American Cancer Society (ACS). In their most recent iterations, both groups lowered the age at which average-risk people should begin screening to age 45 (NEJM JW Gen Med Jun 15 2021 and JAMA 2021; 325:1965; and CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68:250). Now, the American College of Physicians (ACP) has weighed in with a “Guidance Statement”: The authors reviewed the evidence that informed the USPSTF and ACS recommendations and drew their own conclusions — several of which disagree with those of other organizations.
Key Recommendations
- The ACP favors initiating routine screening at age 50 rather than age 45. Although the actual wording is a bit tentative (“Clinicians should consider not screening asymptomatic average-risk adults between the ages of 45 to 49 years”), the authors argue that the microsimulation models used by the USPSTF overestimate the net benefit of screening in this age group.
- Screening should stop at age 75, or when life expectancy is less than 10 years.
- The ACP finds the following screening tests acceptable: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) or high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood testing every 2 years; colonoscopy every 10 years; or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 10 years plus FIT every 2 years. The ACP believes that evidence supports biennial FIT or guaiac testing, rather than the annual testing recommended by the USPSTF and ACS.
- Unlike the USPSTF and ACS, the ACP recommends against using stool DNA testing (i.e., Cologuard) based on its considerable expense, higher false-positive rate, and lack of data on morbidity and mortality (compared with other fecal tests). Readers should note that Cologuard includes both a stool DNA test and FIT.
Comment
Important differences between the ACP and the other U.S. organizations are the recommendation against lowering the screening age to 45 for average-risk people, the move from annual to biennial FIT or guaiac testing, and the recommendation against stool DNA testing. These differences shouldn't be surprising: Balancing the benefits and harms of screening tests is often a value judgment on how to apply a mix of observational studies and randomized trials of varying quality. In my view, the ACP's analysis is reasonable; clinicians now have a broader range of screening options supported by professional organizations. For additional perspective, I strongly recommend that primary care clinicians read the excellent editorial that accompanies this guidance statement.
Citation(s)
Author:
Qaseem A et al.
Title:
Screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic average-risk adults: A guidance statement from the American College of Physicians (version 2).
Source:
Ann Intern Med
2023
Aug
1; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Bretthauer M and Yang Y-X.
Title:
New American College of Physicians guidance on colorectal cancer screening: Less is more.
Source:
Ann Intern Med
2023
Aug
1; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Allan S. Brett, MD