Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Radiation Therapy for Asymptomatic Bone Metastases
Skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with cancer metastases to bone can be reduced by 10% to 20% with bone-modifying agents (e.g., bisphosphonates). Although radiation therapy is used to palliate painful bone metastases, data regarding its use in the asymptomatic setting are limited.
In this multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial, investigators compared prophylactic radiation therapy against standard of care for high-risk, asymptomatic bone metastases. Seventy-eight adults with widely metastatic solid tumor malignancies and 122 bone metastases were randomized to receive radiation therapy or standard of care (systemic therapy or observation). The most common primary cancers were lung (27%), breast (24%), and prostate (22%). The trial's primary outcome was SREs, defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, orthopedic surgery, or palliative radiation therapy for pain.
The radiation therapy arm had a significant reduction in SREs compared with the standard care arm (1.6% vs. 28.6%; P<.001). Additionally, significantly fewer patients in the radiation arm were hospitalized for SREs (0 vs. 11%, respectively; P=.045). Overall survival was longer in the radiation arm than the standard care arm (median, 1.7 vs. 1.0 years; hazard ratio, 0.49; P=0.18), but the study was not powered for this outcome. Among patients who were not on an opioid at study entry, opioid-free probability did not differ between arms (HR, 0.57; P=0.5). Treatment-related complications were uncommon, and no grade 3 or higher radiation-related adverse events were reported.
Comment
This randomized clinical trial fills an important gap in the literature. Prophylactic radiation therapy should be considered for asymptomatic, high-risk bone metastases in patients with widely metastatic solid tumor malignancies to help reduce SREs and hospitalization. There is no evidence, however, that prophylactic radiation avoids opioid use in this population.
Citation(s)
Author:
Gillespie EF et al.
Title:
Prophylactic radiation therapy versus standard of care for patients with high-risk asymptomatic bone metastases: A multicenter, randomized phase ii clinical trial.
Source:
J Clin Oncol
2024
Jan
1; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Elizabeth Prsic, MD