Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Optimal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–targeted agents plus two-drug chemotherapy (e.g., FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) are preferred for use in left-sided RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancers. When bevacizumab is used, three-drug chemotherapy (e.g., FOLFOXIRI) has trended superior to two-drug chemotherapy. Hepatic resection of liver metastases improves survival, and systemic chemotherapy is used to augment local regional therapy.
The open-label CAIRO5 trial evaluated four chemotherapy regimens in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with hepatic metastases confined to the liver but potentially resectable, contingent on a response to chemotherapy. Patients with RAS or BRAF mutant cancers or right-sided primary tumors were randomized to bevacizumab plus either FOLFOXIRI or investigator's choice of FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. Patients with left-sided and RAS and BRAF wild-type cancers were randomized to either bevacizumab or panitumumab plus investigator's choice of FOLFOX or FOLFIRI. An expert panel assessed resectability.
Of 521 patients, 62% were men, 89% presented with synchronous metastases, 31% had the primary tumor resected, 74% had left-sided primary tumors, and 6% had BRAF mutations. Median follow-up was approximately 50 months. In patients with right-sided or RAS/BRAF mutant cancers, the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was superior with FOLFOXIRI versus two-drug chemotherapy (median, 10.6 vs. 9.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.76; P=0.032). The FOLFOXIRI arm also had significantly higher response rate (54% vs. 33%; P=0.0004) and higher rate of liver-directed therapy (57% vs. 46%; P=0.79). In patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type tumors, PFS did not differ between the panitumumab and bevacizumab arms (10.4 vs. 10.8 months; HR, 1.11; P=0.46). Response rates were higher with panitumumab (80% vs. 53%; P<0.0001), but rates of liver-directed therapy did not differ (69% and 68%).
Comment
This biomarker-driven trial provides guidance for chemotherapy selection in patients with colon cancer being considered for hepatic resection or liver-directed therapies. For right-sided or RAS/BRAF mutant cancers, bevacizumab plus FOLFOXIRI was superior to bevacizumab plus two-drug chemotherapy. For left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type cancers, the addition of an EGFR-targeted agent to two-drug chemotherapy did not improve PFS over bevacizumab, despite higher response rate, and did not increase liver-directed therapy; optimal therapy for these patients therefore could include either FOLFOXIRI/bevacizumab or two-drug chemotherapy plus an EGFR-targeted agent.
Citation(s)
Author:
Bond MJG et al.
Title:
First-line systemic treatment strategies in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CAIRO5): An open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study from the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
Source:
Lancet Oncol
2023
Jul
; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
David H. Ilson, MD, PhD