Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Trends in Lung Cancer Presentation and Survival in the Era of Screening
In December 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer in high-risk individuals (NEJM JW Gen Med Feb 15 2014 and Ann Intern Med 2014; 160:330). Randomized trials demonstrated that malignancies were diagnosed at earlier stages and survival improved in screened groups, but these effects have not been demonstrated in real-world populations.
Using U.S. national oncology databases, investigators identified >750,000 patients who received diagnoses of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2010 and 2018. Among these patients, the percentage who received diagnoses of stage I NSCLC and median all-cause survival increased significantly more rapidly from 2014 to 2018 than from 2010 to 2013; in other words, rates of change in early diagnosis and survival increased starting around 2014. By 2018, the proportion of cases diagnosed at stage I had increased to 36%, and median all-cause survival had increased to 28 months. In 2018, for the first time, white patients more often received diagnoses of stage I than of stage IV NSCLC; however, stage IV cases continued to exceed stage I cases in other ethnic groups.
Comment
In this study, the observed accelerated rate of early-stage diagnosis likely is attributable to screening. Screening also might have contributed to longer survival, but advances in treatment also might be a factor, and lead-time bias from screening could inflate survival data artificially. The disturbing persistence of racial and economic disparities in rates of early diagnosis likely is related to unequal access. With studies suggesting that only around 5% of eligible patients were screened in 2015, substantial opportunities undoubtedly remain to limit lung cancer mortality and reduce disparities through more accessible screening.
Citation(s)
Author:
Potter AL et al.
Title:
Association of computed tomography screening with lung cancer stage shift and survival in the United States: Quasi-experimental study.
Source:
BMJ
2022
Mar
30; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Melzer AC and Triplette M.
Title:
Screening high risk populations for lung cancer: Early evidence of a stage shift suggests real world benefits.
Source:
BMJ
2022
Mar
30; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Bruce Soloway, MD