Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Supplemental MRI for Women with Dense Breasts
Starting in September 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is requiring that mammogram results provided to patients include assessment of breast density. For women with dense breasts, the results must state, “other imaging tests in addition to a mammogram may help find cancers.” Appropriate follow-up of such notifications remains uncertain, with recent U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines citing insufficient evidence to recommend for or against supplemental screening based on breast density (NEJM JW Gen Med Jun 1 2024 and JAMA 2024; 331:1918).
In this study, researchers used well-established models to simulate outcomes if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were added to digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) based on breast density. They projected the following:
- Biennial DBT screening for middle-aged women (age range, 50–74) would result in 7.4 breast cancer deaths averted and 884 false-positive recalls per 1000 women during lifetime screening. Adding biennial MRI for women with extremely dense breasts would increase deaths averted by 0.1 and false-positive recalls by 35. Extending MRI to women with heterogeneously dense breasts would lead to an additional 0.5 deaths averted and 170 additional false-positive recalls.
- Starting the above-stated scenarios at age 40 rather than age 50 would lead to similar increases in deaths averted but larger increases in false-positive recalls.
- Annual screening would increase the number of deaths averted slightly but would more than double rates of false positives.
Comment
Women often come to primary care visits — mammogram results in hand — to discuss implications of breast density, but we have limited data about long-term outcomes of supplemental screening for those with dense breasts. The projections in this study might help guide these conversations: Supplemental MRI appears to avert a small number of deaths but would increase false-positive recalls substantially, and harm–benefit trade-offs appear to be most favorable with biennial screening starting at age 50. Discussion of overall breast cancer risk will help individualize these conversations. Finally, insurance coverage for breast MRI varies widely, further complicating recommendations for supplemental imaging.
Citation(s)
Author:
Stout NK et al.
Title:
Breast cancer screening using mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and magnetic resonance imaging by breast density.
Source:
JAMA Intern Med
2024
Aug
26; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Richman IB and Battaglia TA.
Title:
Evaluating supplemental breast cancer screening with simulation modeling.
Source:
JAMA Intern Med
2024
Aug
26; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Molly S. Brett, MD