Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Rivaroxaban vs. Vitamin K Antagonists for Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome
Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin have been the mainstay of therapy for patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). Recent trials have evaluated APS therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), given their predictability and reliability. But concerns have been raised about the efficacy of DOACs in this setting.
Noting limitations in the prior trials, such as early study termination and the use of a laboratory surrogate as an outcome, investigators have conducted a 3-year randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy and safety of the DOAC rivaroxaban with that of VKAs in preventing recurrent thrombosis in 190 adults with thrombotic APS. The majority of patients were women with primary APS and prior venous thrombosis; one-third of patients had cardiovascular risk factors.
Key findings were as follows:
- Recurrent thrombosis (the primary endpoint) occurred in more rivaroxaban recipients than VKA recipients (11 vs. 6), demonstrating that rivaroxaban failed to meet noninferiority criteria; 9 of the thrombotic events in rivaroxaban recipients were arterial (stroke).
- The rate of major bleeding was similar between rivaroxaban recipients and VKA recipients (6.3% and 7.4%, respectively).
- A trend toward recurrent thrombosis was seen in rivaroxaban recipients who had a history of livedo racemosa and mitral valve disease.
Comment
This study adds to a continuing concern about the efficacy of rivaroxaban in patients with APS, especially regarding prevention of arterial thrombosis. Of note, the rate of recurrent thrombosis was higher in the rivaroxaban group, despite INRs (International Normalized Ratios) falling into the therapeutic range only 56% of the time in the VKA group. A lack of protection from arterial thrombosis in rivaroxaban recipients was also reported in a prior study of triple-antibody–positive APS patients (NEJM JW Oncol Hematol Oct 2018 and Blood 2018; 132:1365). Another study evaluating the effectiveness of the DOAC apixaban in APS is underway (NCT02295475). Pending results of this trial, hematologists should caution their APS patients about a potential lack of efficacy of DOACs in preventing APS-associated arterial thrombosis.
Citation(s)
Author:
Ordi-Ros J et al.
Title:
Rivaroxaban versus vitamin K antagonist in antiphospholipid syndrome: A randomized noninferiority trial.
Source:
Ann Intern Med
2019
Oct
15; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Wahl D and Dufrost V.
Title:
Direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome: Too early or too late?
Source:
Ann Intern Med
2019
Oct
15; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Brady L. Stein, MD, MHS