Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Outperforms Other Options for Inpatient VTE Prophylaxis
Most guidelines on preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill medical patients recommend low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or the pentasaccharide fondaparinux; some also recommend unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, guidelines often do not provide dose recommendations for heparins.
To evaluate pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis regimens and dosing, researchers conducted a meta-analysis of 44 trials (all conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic) in which 90,000 acutely ill medical inpatients were assigned as follows:
- LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin, low dose [<40 mg daily] or typical dose [40 mg daily or 30 mg twice daily])
- UFH (e.g., 5000 units twice daily or thrice daily)
- Prophylactic doses of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs; e.g., rivaroxaban [10 mg daily] or apixaban [2.5 mg twice daily])
- Prophylactic-dose fondaparinux (2.5 mg daily)
- Placebo or no intervention
Compared with placebo, typical prophylactic-dose LMWH and prophylactic-dose fondaparinux both significantly reduced symptomatic VTE (odds ratios, 0.66 and 0.32, respectively) — with LMWH results based on >20,000 patients (≈20 studies) and fondaparinux results based on <850 patients (single study). None of the interventions lowered mortality compared with placebo. Typical prophylactic-dose UFH (e.g., 5000 units thrice daily) and prophylactic-dose DOACs significantly increased major bleeding (ORs, 2.63 and 2.31, respectively).
Comment
For pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in medical inpatients, LMWH carries the most robust evidence to optimize benefits while limiting harms, whereas unfractionated heparin and DOACs have the least favorable profile. Although low-risk inpatients should not receive pharmacologic prophylaxis (J Hosp Med 2021; 16:301), this meta-analysis supports prophylaxis with LMWH for medical inpatients at moderate-to-high risk and also supports limiting use of DOACs and UFH for this purpose.
Citation(s)
Author:
Eck RJ et al.
Title:
Anticoagulants for thrombosis prophylaxis in acutely ill patients admitted to hospital: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Source:
BMJ
2022
Jul
4; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Bruce Soloway, MD
Empfohlen von
Daniel D. Dressler, MD, MSc, MHM, FACP