Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
Improving Equity in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility
According to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations and insurance requirements, eligibility for lung cancer screening by computed tomography requires ≥20 pack-years of smoking (NEJM JW Gen Med Apr 15 2021 and JAMA 2021; 325:962). Pack-year calculations combine “smoking intensity” (number of cigarettes daily) with smoking duration; however, we don't know if pack-years are a better marker for lung cancer risk than is smoking duration alone. This issue has relevance for racial disparities in the U.S.: Black patients, who tend to have lower smoking intensity than white patients, are less likely to qualify for screening and more likely to have advanced-stage lung cancers at diagnosis.
In this retrospective U.S. study, researchers analyzed two large cohorts with data on smoking history and incidence of lung cancer. The hypothetical performance of the standard ≥20-pack-year screening criterion was compared with a proposed ≥20-year smoking-duration criterion.
Among patients in one cohort who eventually developed lung cancer, 58% of Black patients and 74% of white patients would have qualified for screening under the pack-year criterion. These proportions increased to 85% and 82%, respectively, under the smoking-duration criterion, which is a substantial improvement in sensitivity and eliminates the racial disparity. In the second cohort (comprised exclusively of Black patients), a smoking-duration criterion would have been more sensitive for predicting eventual lung cancer.
Comment
This analysis supports smoking duration as a more equitable criterion than smoking intensity. Smoking duration has the added benefit of being easier to assess, which could simplify implementation of screening programs and improve uptake. For now, most of us still will have to attest to patients' eligibility based on pack-years, but findings like these eventually might lead to changes in screening requirements.
Citation(s)
Author:
Potter AL et al.
Title:
Pack-year smoking history: An inadequate and biased measure to determine lung cancer screening eligibility.
Source:
J Clin Oncol
2024
Jun
10; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Sarah E. Post, MD