Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
CNS Prophylaxis in High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (MTX), intrathecal MTX, or both are commonly given in conjunction with induction immunochemotherapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and risk factors for parenchymal or leptomeningeal central nervous system (CNS) relapse; risk factors include testicular, sinonasal, renal, and adrenal sites of disease. To determine whether timing of MTX administration affects outcomes, investigators conducted an international retrospective analysis of 1384 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who were deemed at high risk for CNS relapse.
Patients had received cycles of induction R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) along with high-dose MTX administered either intercalated with or after completion of the induction cycles. Roughly half of patients also received intrathecal MTX.
The 3-year rate of CNS relapse did not differ between the intercalated-MTX and end-of-treatment-MTX groups (5.7% and 5.8%). In the subset of patients with the highest CNS-international prognostic index risk scores, relapse rates also were similar in the two groups (9.1% and 10.5%, respectively). Intrathecal MTX did not affect outcomes. Treatment-related toxicities were higher with intercalated MTX, which impaired the ability to deliver on-schedule, full-dose induction therapy — which may in turn impair systemic disease control.
Comment
Recognition that the agents in standard R-CHOP poorly cross the blood–brain barrier and that CNS relapse is associated with high rates of mortality led to the use of intrathecal MTX or CNS-penetrating high-dose MTX to address potential sanctuary site relapse. The current study adds to the growing pool of retrospective data — no prospective study has been or is likely to be performed — suggesting that the high-dose MTX strategy has limited if any benefit outside of the highest risk patients. Whether better systemic DLBCL control via incorporation of novel agents on the R-CHOP backbone, such as polatuzumab, or adding an agent with both systemic and CNS penetration, such as ibrutinib, will improve outcomes remains to be established. Better understanding of biomarkers for CNS relapse and of subtypes of DLBCL that carry increased risk for CNS relapse and have shown enhanced response to targeted combinations of therapies is clearly needed.
Citation(s)
Author:
Wilson MR et al.
Title:
Timing of high-dose methotrexate CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL: A multicenter international analysis of 1384 patients.
Source:
Blood
2022
Apr
21; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Author:
Portell CA.
Title:
CNS prophylaxis in DLBCL: First do no harm.
Source:
Blood
2022
Apr
21; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
Michael E. Williams, MD, ScM