Sie sind bereits registriert?
Loggen Sie sich mit Ihrem Universimed-Benutzerkonto ein:
Sie sind noch nicht registriert?
Registrieren Sie sich jetzt kostenlos auf universimed.com und erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen Artikeln, bewerten Sie Inhalte und speichern Sie interessante Beiträge in Ihrem persönlichen Bereich
zum späteren Lesen. Ihre Registrierung ist für alle Unversimed-Portale gültig. (inkl. allgemeineplus.at & med-Diplom.at)
For Patients with Breast Cancer, Which Postoperative Radiation Schedule Is Best?
Various radiation fractionation schedules exist in breast cancer treatment, and different clinical scenarios might make one approach more appropriate than another. Important considerations beyond efficacy are adverse effect profiles and cosmesis. To learn more about these effects in a meta-analysis, investigators searched all relevant, randomized, controlled, postsurgical studies worldwide to identify 35 clinical trials (>20,000 patients) evaluating different fractionation schedules: conventional fractionation (CF; daily dose, 1.8–2.0 Gy; typical total dose, 50.0–50.4 Gy, in 25–28 fractions over 5–6 weeks), moderate hypofractionation (MHF; daily dose, 2.65–3.30 Gy; 13–16 fractions over 3–5 weeks), or ultra-fractionation (UHF; 5 total fractions).
The risk for grade 2 or higher acute radiation dermatitis was significantly less with MHF than CF, both overall and separately in breast-conserving and post-mastectomy patient groups. This risk was not statistically different between MHF and UHF. Late effects of hyperpigmentation and shrinkage of the breast were also significantly less with MHF than CF but only overall and in the post-mastectomy group. Clinical endpoints of survival and recurrence were similar with CF, MHF, and UHF.
Comment
Assessments of radiation dermatitis, breast shrinkage, and hyperpigmentation are often quite subjective. Compiling multiple trials from around the world conducted by innumerable investigators who make such assessments requires dealing with inconsistencies and raises the possibility of bias. Nonetheless, the “10,000-foot view” that a meta-analysis provides does suggest differences supporting the use of MHF over other schedules. Today, at least in the U.S., radiation oncologists very commonly use MHF schedules.
Citation(s)
Author:
Lee SF et al.
Title:
Randomised controlled trials on radiation dose fractionation in breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on side effects and cosmesis.
Source:
BMJ
2024
Sep
11; [e-pub].
(Abstract/FREE Full Text)
Empfohlen von
William J. Gradishar, MD